Apple's Decision and Legal Challenges

International lawyers representing the Democratic Republic of Congo have expressed cautious welcome to Apple's decision to halt sourcing minerals from the conflict-ridden region. However, they remain committed to pursuing legal cases against Apple subsidiaries in Europe, alleging the use of conflict minerals in the tech giant's supply chain.

Criminal complaints were filed in France and Belgium this week, accusing Apple of benefiting from minerals sourced from armed groups involved in atrocities. Congo is a significant supplier of tin, tantalum, and tungsten, crucial for electronic devices, but some mining operations are linked to severe human rights violations, according to UN experts and rights groups.

Apple has strongly denied the allegations, asserting that it has instructed suppliers to cease sourcing these minerals from Congo and Rwanda. The company emphasizes its commitment to supplier audits, transparency, and funding initiatives aimed at improving mineral traceability.

The lawyers, while acknowledging Apple's statement, stressed the need for on-the-ground verification of these claims. They also highlighted that Apple's actions do not absolve it of responsibility for past alleged complicity in Congo's conflict-driven mining practices.

The outcome of the legal battle now rests with French and Belgian judicial authorities, who have yet to comment on the case.